NATO has adapted: An alliance with
a new mission
Op-Ed by R. Nicholas
Burns, U.S. Ambassador To NATO
published in the
International Herald Tribune
on 24 May 2003
BRUSSELS -- NATO's decision Wednesday to provide
extensive military support to the Polish division
in Iraq represents a giant step forward for the 54-year-old
alliance. Together with its decision April 16 to
take the lead in the international peacekeeping force
in Afghanistan, this action places the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization squarely on the front lines in
the global war on terror. As U.S. ambassador to NATO,
I know that the United States enthusiastically endorses
NATO's new emphasis on confronting the most virulent
security threat of our time - terrorism and weapons
of mass destruction.
Presumed dead more often than the hero in a melodrama,
the new NATO keeps on defying the pundits' predictions
by adapting itself to a rapidly changing world. This
doesn't mean that the alliance has not had serious
difficulties. NATO had a near-death experience in
February, when differences over Iraq caused an unpardonable
delay in responding to Turkey's request for assistance
to deter a potential attack by Saddam Hussein's forces.
Nevertheless, NATO did finally act, living up to
its fundamental commitment to defend its members
against external threats.
For NATO to heal the rift opened by the crisis in
February and revitalize the trans-Atlantic relationship,
however, it must transform itself fundamentally,
as it was called upon to do by alliance leaders at
the Prague summit meeting in November. To complete
its pivot from its Cold War focus on Europe to confront
the real threats to our security in Southwest Asia,
the Middle East and beyond, it is crucial that NATO
succeed in Afghanistan, in Iraq and in building military
capabilities.
NATO has committed itself to going wherever it is
needed to defend its members against the threats
of terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. The
down payment on that promise is NATO's historic decision
last month to take over the International Security
Assistance Force in Kabul in August. NATO's new leading
role in Afghanistan - the alliance's first military
operation outside Europe - will give it a key mission
on the front lines of the global war on terror.
Defying its skeptics, NATO has now also agreed to
provide military support for the Polish division
in the Iraq stabilization force. With this first
step and the possibility of a greater role in Iraq
in the future, NATO will position itself as a major
force in Middle East peacekeeping.
A NATO in which the United States has more than
200 strategic lift aircraft, Britain has four and
the rest of the allies have none is unsustainable.
America's European allies must now begin to meet
their commitments to address rapidly the alarming
imbalances in airlift, precision-guided munitions,
air-to-air refueling, and secure communications.
Without these capabilities, most European nations
will not, in the future, be able to meaningfully
contribute to modern military operations, making
hollow any plans for a serious European-American
security partnership.
Of course, there are unilateralists who don't want
NATO to succeed. Some Americans argue that the United
States has no need for allies and can afford to go
it alone in the world. Their position is a recipe
for failure and has been firmly rejected by my government.
Some Europeans, on the other hand, think they can
create a unified continental foreign policy with
opposition to the United States as its raison d'être.
They call for European-only military headquarters
that would needlessly duplicate what NATO already
offers and have zero real utility, unless the objective
is to weaken our ability to work together. Their
vision of Europe as a countervailing power to the
United States is one that would destroy the cooperative
spirit that has held us together in NATO.
These U.S. and Continental unilateralists present
us with a false choice, one that would weaken NATO's
preeminent role in tying North America to Europe.
Fortunately we don't have to play by their zero-sum
rules.
As Secretary of State Colin Powell told the Senate
recently: "This great alliance, which has kept
the peace for more than 50 years, is more than a
treaty for collective defense, it is the central
organizing force in a great web of relationships
that holds North America and Europe together."
It is time to bury our animosities and heal trans-Atlantic
ties with a generosity of spirit true to our long,
historic friendship in NATO. By working together
in the alliance, we can revive the kind of cooperation
on issues of international peace and security that
helped us win the Cold War, and will be essential
to winning the global war on terror. The new NATO
remains our greatest bridge to our common European
and American vision for a strong and prosperous future.
|